South Alabama
Men -
Women
2013
-
2014 -
2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
199 |
Michael Pienaar |
FR |
32:09 |
222 |
Christoph Graf |
JR |
32:14 |
885 |
Patrick Rohr |
JR |
33:29 |
1,206 |
Joe Gratton |
SR |
33:56 |
1,242 |
Robert Mann |
SR |
33:59 |
1,253 |
Justin Housley |
SR |
34:00 |
1,794 |
Daniel Carter |
SO |
34:42 |
2,269 |
Buddy Soto |
JR |
35:29 |
2,928 |
Philip Friendlander |
FR |
37:22 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
32.3% |
Top 10 in Regional |
95.6% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Michael Pienaar |
Christoph Graf |
Patrick Rohr |
Joe Gratton |
Robert Mann |
Justin Housley |
Daniel Carter |
Buddy Soto |
Philip Friendlander |
Chili Pepper Festival |
10/04 |
914 |
31:49 |
32:04 |
33:36 |
|
34:04 |
33:39 |
|
|
|
Alabama Crimson Classic |
10/17 |
1067 |
32:10 |
|
33:29 |
33:55 |
34:23 |
33:25 |
34:26 |
35:26 |
37:22 |
Sun Belt Conference Championships |
11/02 |
977 |
32:17 |
32:13 |
33:19 |
33:49 |
33:48 |
34:31 |
34:43 |
35:15 |
|
South Region Championships |
11/14 |
1016 |
32:19 |
32:18 |
|
34:05 |
33:45 |
34:33 |
34:54 |
35:53 |
|
NCAA Championship |
11/22 |
|
|
32:44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
30.5 |
806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
Region Championship |
100% |
6.6 |
228 |
|
0.0 |
0.2 |
8.1 |
23.9 |
25.4 |
16.6 |
11.1 |
6.5 |
3.7 |
2.1 |
1.3 |
0.8 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Michael Pienaar |
66.9% |
141.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christoph Graf |
57.4% |
152.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patrick Rohr |
0.0% |
203.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joe Gratton |
0.0% |
239.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Mann |
0.0% |
243.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Justin Housley |
0.0% |
247.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Carter |
0.0% |
251.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Michael Pienaar |
7.1 |
0.7 |
3.2 |
6.7 |
9.0 |
11.1 |
10.1 |
8.6 |
8.7 |
6.7 |
6.3 |
4.6 |
3.4 |
2.9 |
2.5 |
2.0 |
1.8 |
1.7 |
1.2 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
Christoph Graf |
8.3 |
0.1 |
1.5 |
3.9 |
5.8 |
8.5 |
9.5 |
9.9 |
8.9 |
7.5 |
6.0 |
5.3 |
4.3 |
3.8 |
3.2 |
2.8 |
2.1 |
2.1 |
1.4 |
1.6 |
1.1 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
0.7 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
Patrick Rohr |
52.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
Joe Gratton |
78.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Mann |
81.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Justin Housley |
82.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Carter |
119.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
2 |
3 |
0.2% |
8.3% |
| |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
0.0 |
3 |
4 |
8.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
4 |
5 |
23.9% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
5 |
6 |
25.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
16.6% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
7 |
8 |
11.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
6.5% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
3.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
2.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
1.3% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
0.8% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
Texas-Arlington |
0.4% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
1.0 |